Elaine Benes Was Right

Elaine Benes in Seinfeld

Elaine Benes was right: "Quit telling your stupid story about the stupid desert!" 

In a famous episode of Seinfeld (aren't they all?), Elaine put her job on the line over her intense dislike of the 1996 Oscar-winner, The English Patient. Over the past few weeks, it's been easy to mock how irrelevant the Oscars and Hollywood in general have become, but a look back on the values of this Best Picture winner made in 1996 shows how far removed from old fashioned American values we already were then. 

It doesn't matter that the film was a period piece set in the years leading up to the Second World War until its end, the values of it are decidedly the era of egocentric "end of history" analysis that brainwashed a few generations into thinking that globalization was an inevitable weather pattern, there was nothing we could do about it, and not to worry because it's overwhelmingly good.

1990s America (Hollywood) - maybe the last successful decade we've had, where community and family and the overall trajectory of the country still felt secure - awarded this as its Best Picture of the Year that had the benefit of hindsight while promoting values far removed from the values that won the Second World War. 

Now consider a great film: Casablanca - made at the height of that war, when its outcome was still very much in doubt - is told with a confidence and value-set that almost assumes its victorious outcome. Premiering in late-1942, what makes the film particularly remarkable is that it was considered an ordinary assembly-line Hollywood picture of its day, despite its A-list stars. 

Casablanca (1942)

Rick Blaine is a quintessential American original whereas "The English Patient" (who is Hungarian), László Almásy, is a "citizen of the world." 

One of the film's most memorable lines is: "We are the real countries, not the boundaries drawn on maps with the names of powerful men." That is not a line born out of shared sacrifices abroad and Rosie the Riveter and silent, stoic, and resilient children at home. That is the dialogue not of the 1940s values, but of the 1990s where globalization is eternal and final, tech optimism reigned, and we'd probably never have a major war again... or something. 

The romance that is central to both films is told mostly or entirely through backstory, and again settles on radically different conclusions. 

Blaine's individualistic streak is evident throughout the film, yet by the end he arrives at the honorable end that serves the war effort. The culture churned out those ethics, built on community and obligation, which allowed its ordered liberty and individualism to strengthen the civics of a nation, whether through the little platoons of Tocquevillian democracy, or through the cultural ethos that produced so much greatness that it overcame flaws without coming undone. Rick Blaine was admirable because he was selfless in the end.

Rick Blaine was admirable because he was selfless in the end.

Whereas Almásy sells out his country and his friends in pursuit of "love," which is really just an infatuation with a married woman. 

With its glorious shots of the desert and sweeping romantic score, there is no doubt that The English Patient is technically impressive and designed to win you over, not just cinematically, but in its values, too. 

This, too, is another area where Casablanca triumphs, which ends in sacrifice for something greater than yourself for many of its characters, not just the lead. This is what the ethos of globalization infecting the 1996-made period piece gets wrong. It is the people within the countries, the families and communities and nations that make up those boundaries and lines on a map if you're doing it right. It is the social trust and sense of mutual obligation we have to another that counts at history's pivotal moments. And whether we are at one such moment or not, stop telling your stupid story about the stupid desert indeed, and let's get on with rebuilding our social trust and sense of mutual obligation to one another, and eschew the rootless and unmoored society of users, strangers, and libertines.


Troy M. Olson is an Army Veteran, lawyer by training, and co-author of ‘The Emerging Populist Majority’ available at Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Target. He is the Sergeant-at-Arms of the New York Young Republican Club and co-founder of its Veterans Caucus. He has appeared on CNN, CBS, and OAN. He lives in New York City with his wife and two children, and is the 3rd Vice Commander (“Americanism” pillar) of the first new American Legion Post in the city in years, Post 917. You can follow him on X/Twitter and Substack at @TroyMOlson

The Power of Intergenerational Connectedness

 

Photo from WBUR website

I often remark that the elderly are like invisible people: We get irritated when they walk too slow, take too much time sorting through their expired coupons at the grocery store check-out, or strain to hear us when we speak to them. 

To many young and middle-aged people, they're nothing more than a burden. Their utility, in other words, is all used up. 

The fact of the matter, though, is that many elderly people are the best of us. 

In Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, where I live, I often see old men wearing Vietnam veteran caps. These guys are bad asses, and God knows what they've seen. My dad makes it a habit to offer to buy them breakfast. 

We owe them a debt of gratitude. 

When they are unwell, we should see it as our problem.

According to The University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging from 2024, 33.4% of respondents between the ages of 50-80 reported feeling a lack of companionship "some of the time" or "often."

This is inexcusable. 

One group, though, is taking it upon themselves, not only to help ameliorate loneliness in the elderly, but to do it by engaging young people, many of whom also report feeling exceedingly isolated.  

Matter Neuroscience, a health and wellness company founded in 2019, has taken some innovative steps towards bridging the gap between lonely boomers and zoomers. 

As reported by CNN, "a team from Matter Neuroscience has refurbished two old payphones and set one up at a coffee shop near Boston University, and the other at a retirement community in Nevada. The signs read, 'call a boomer,' and 'call a zoomer,' and they automatically ring to the other side when you pick them up."

This is called intergenerational connectedness. The elderly need not be constrained to the company in their retirement communities. Using twenty-first century technology, they can easily be connected with a young person 3,000 miles away. 

Marilyn Onkka, a 70-year-old caller that CNN interviewed, said that "you can end up talking with somebody that - in our short lives, with the time we have left - can become a long-time friend." 

Here's a little bit from a WBUR article about the payphones:
When Marcantonio picked up the phone on BU’s campus, it rang a few times, then 73-year-old Maria Jaynes answered. Jaynes lives in Reno, Nevada, at a Volunteers of America senior affordable housing community. The payphone inside the senior center looks similar to the one in Boston, but instead, it reads “call a zoomer.”

Marcantonio and Jaynes talk about the weather, comparing the 20-degree chill in Boston to the 80-degree-and-sunny forecast in Reno. Marcantonio asks Jaynes what activities the senior center has planned for the week, and Jaynes tells him she likes playing bingo, doing puzzles and watching movies.
I hope more inventive projects like this catch on. There's no reason for anyone - whether they be boomers or zoomers - to be devoid of social connection. 

Sorry, Piers, but Dave Rubin Is Right

 


Welp, it looks like Dave Rubin and Piers Morgan are beefing on X...

Earlier this month, Rubin posted the following clip:

Rubin rightly remarked that Morgan's provocative show is only "adding fuel to the fire." In other words, in a political climate where tensions are already high and debate is rife with invective and ad hominem attacks, Morgan's show - which is really nothing more than dumb caricatures of liberals and conservatives screaming at each other for an hour - is the last thing America needs. 

During the conversation, Morgan didn't really rebut Rubin's assertion, calling it a "pretty fair criticism" and saying that other critics of his show have called him "the Jerry Springer of political debate."

Shortly after the clip was posted, however, Morgan wrote on X that Rubin "won’t ever be doing my show again, in any capacity."

Whatever Dave's politics, I completely agree with him here. 

In fact, I've written about the toxic nature of Morgan's show before. Below is an article I wrote in October of 2024. I had it sitting in my drafts, and figured it was timely:

We are 35 days away from choosing our next president. Crazy how fast time flies, eh?

I don't need to harp on our societal scourge of hyper-polarization; we all see it. This is not Reagan v. Mondale; according to the legacy media, this is about safeguarding democracy. 

When people carelessly say ridiculous things like, "democracy is hanging by a thread," it gives us the impression that things are way worse and way more severe than they actually are. Democracy is, in fact, not hanging in the balance. While there is certainly a lot at stake in November, we'll be fine either way. 

Thankfully, we have smart, reasonable people, like the State Policy Network's Erin Norman and Lura Forcum, providing us with thoughtful research. Their 2024 study, Beyond Polarization, is instructive. When I interviewed Erin for a National Review article back in July, she reiterated to me that ideological pluralism is part of our National DNA. "America," she remarked, "is a very large nation that, from the very beginning, was made up of lots of separate communities that had their own traditions and their own ways of doing things.” 

If you were to just look on X or other social media, however, you would not see a healthy sort of pluralism. Rather, you would see a people on the brink of civil war. Piers Morgan's YouTube channel is particularly awful. Just look at the thumbnails he chooses for his videos. They capture the most combative points of his program. Often, the thumbnail displays two people on opposing sides of a debate angrily gesticulating at each other and making faces. What's more, many of the guests he chooses to bring on are nothing more than pseudo-intellectual political provocateurs, that are not debating in good faith. 

Look at this screenshot of Morgan's YouTube channel. His viewership is high, but at what cost? His channel is, ultimately, a schlocky platform for caustic nonsense. 


Need a palate-cleanser? I would highly recommend Mark Halperin's 2Way program on YouTube. Here, Halperin's motto is "peace, love, and understanding." Another thing Halperin often says is that you should make it a point to give people, especially those whom you disagree, "the presumption of grace." This is a marked difference from Morgan's highly divisive click-bait. 

Now look at this screenshot of Halperin's YouTube channel:


Big difference, right? The problem, however, are the very disparate viewership numbers: outrage sells. 

But high blood pressure sucks. There's no need for it. I fully believe the American body politic to be more than capable of engaging in civil, thoughtful dialectic. 

If you're looking for a dose of humor with your civil debate, I would also check out Robert Wright's Nonzero YouTube channel. His episodes with Mickey Kaus are especially rich.


Enjoy, and do send me your podcast recommendations! 

Netflix's 'The Singers' Tackles Social Isolation

 

Photo from Oscar-nominated film, The Singers

The Singers captures man's desire for brotherhood and fraternity. 
While scrolling LinkedIn today, I stumbled upon the below post from my friends at the Foundation for Social Connection: 


Aside from the odd documentary, I don't really frequent Netflix much. In fact, most of the content on there seems thoroughly unappealing. 

So, I was surprised when I came across something that actually looked substantive. 

At just 18-minutes long, Sam Davis's The Singers says a lot in a short duration of time. 

Taking place in a dimly lit dive bar - the kind of bar where credit card isn't accepted, the bathroom's paper towel dispenser is always empty, and outsiders are looked at with skepticism - The Singers captures man's desire for brotherhood and fraternity. 

Through song, the men at the pub - many of whom look like they've been through hell - transcend their real-world circumstances, and enter into another realm. 

For them, pain, loneliness, and isolation is quotidian. Music, however, disrupted all of that and ushered in a needed catharsis. 

Suddenly, they weren't all alone anymore. 

The film is spiritual, really. Do yourself a favor: Take 18-minutes out of your day and watch it.

You can thank me later. 

Some Positive News

 

Photo from X: @NYCMayor

Unfortunately, I haven't time to write much of anything this week, as I'll be traveling. 

I will, however, leave you with this X post from New York City's Mayor, Zohran Mamdani:

I don't care what anyone says: collaboration between the Mayor and President Trump is a good thing

On X, pollster Frank Luntz wrote the following: "If Zohran and Trump can work together, the rest of us have no excuse not to do the same."

Hard agree. 

Anyway, see you next week!

Fukuyama on Trust

  Screenshot from Frankly Fukuyama on YouTube By Frank Filocomo You may not agree with Francis Fukuyama's politics - I, for one, mostly...